Hartwell Perspective by
Online Columnist Dean Hartwell
Read His Latest Book Dead
Men Talking: Consequences of Government Lies!
Dead Men Talking:
Consequences of Government Lies is
an indictment of
recent history which provides truth about
the assassinations of JFK and RFK and 9/11.
Read the proof of government misconduct in
each of these three events!
Here are the words of Kennedy assassination
expert James DiEugenio in his review of the
book:
When I
finished the Afterword to The
Assassinations I wrote that, as in
Camus' The Myth of Sisyphus,
after the murder of RFK, those who
believed in him and his cause felt like
the stone was at the bottom of the hill.
And they were alone. Today, we are not.
History has caught up with some of the
public. They don't like what America has
become either. In that regard, we need
more people like Dean Hartwell...Few who
were alive in 1963 would argue the fact
that the country we live in today does
not resemble what we had then.
Hartwell's effort is that of a true
patriot offering an attempt to bridge
that gap and explain how it all
happened. For the benefit of us all.
Read the rest of the DiEugenio review
here
This is DiEugenio's Update of the Review
Buy Dead Men Talking
It is available on
Amazon for $9.99.
OpEdNews Page for Dean Hartwell -His latest
columns on the news of the day
Archives
Dean has written a
total of over three hundred columns in the
last decade!
On Conspiracy
Dean's writings on
conspiracy theory formed the basis of the
book Dead Men Talking
Author's Account of Will and Grace Trial He and
his fellow jurors rendered a verdict that
found NBC guilty of fraud in a profit
participation contract NBC signed with the
co-founders of the TV show "Will and Grace."
But before the verdict could be read, the
judge dismissed Dean, the foreperson!
This link will give you the full story on
what happened.
Official web site of Judyth Vary
Baker - Oswald's Lover Judyth has written a book
"Me and Lee," due out in March 2010.
Other Links on This Site
You can learn about
Dean's first book, Truth Matters: How
the Voters Can Take Back Their Nation.
Contact Dean -
Email Dean with this link
Dead Man Talking - A Satirical
Conversation between Oswald and the Warren
Commission!
Chief Justice Earl Warren:
Mr. Lee Harvey Oswald, we, the
Commission find you guilty of the murders of
President John Kennedy and Officer J.D.
Tippit.
Before I pronounce your sentence, do
you have anything to say to the Commission?
Lee Harvey Oswald: Yes, Your Honor.
I do.
I never received a trial, let alone a
fair trial.
You will violate my due process
rights by punishing me.
Warren:
We could not try you because you had an
abortive transfer while in custody of the
Dallas Police.
Oswald:
You mean I was murdered!
Warren:
Wait, Mr. Oswald.
You must not prejudice the rights of
Mr. Ruby!
Oswald:
What about my rights?
I asked for counsel several times but
the Dallas police never stopped
interrogating me.
Warren:
You should have told them to stop until your
lawyer arrived.
Oswald:
The only way my lawyer could have gotten
past the police is if he was Jack Ruby!
Warren:
Watch it, Mr. Oswald!
I warned you that you must not
comment on Mr. Ruby.
Your lack of counsel complaint is
denied.
What else would you like to say?
Oswald:
You took Captain Fritz’ word for it about
what I said during hours and hours of
interrogation.
He could have asked anyone standing
outside the room for a tape recorder.
Warren:
That is not for you to decide.
Besides, some people are gifted with
great memories and we had to give Captain
Fritz the benefit of the doubt.
Any other complaints?
Oswald:
Your commission used my wife Marina’s
testimony against me.
What happened to the spousal
immunity?
Warren:
It ended when you expired.
Tough break.
What else?
Oswald:
When the police brought me in, they told me
something about a policeman being killed.
Then they kept asking me questions
about the President!
Warren:
Yes.
It was a neat way of getting around
the right to counsel problem.
Come on, Mr. Oswald.
The Commission’s time is precious.
Oswald:
Those line-ups the police used caused undue
prejudice against me!
They brought in people that did not
look a thing like me and the witnesses had
all seen my face on television!
Warren:
Those police officers were just refreshing
the memories of the witnesses, Mr. Oswald.
We are sure it was harmless error.
Oswald:
Where was the evidence against me?
I read your Report several times and
I do not believe a reasonable person could
find me guilty of anything.
I do not recognize the murder weapon,
so tell me how I used it.
Warren:
The experts found your prints on it.
Oswald:
Yes.
The FBI put my prints there – when I
was in the morgue!
Warren:
Maybe, Mr. Oswald.
But we know the public still trusts
the government enough not to buy your
defense.
Oswald:
I was nowhere near the sixth floor when the
President was shot.
I was downstairs on the first floor.
Warren:
Sorry, Mr. Oswald.
You just weren’t believable.
Oswald:
But you believed Mr. Brennan, who said that
from on the ground he could describe the
height of a man on the sixth floor even
though you concluded that I was in a crouch.
He admitted he had lied to the
authorities about whether he recognized me.
Warren:
We believed him, but we did not base our
case against you on him.
Oswald:
And you chose not to believe Mr. Arnold, who
saw a colored man on the sixth floor close
to the time of the shooting.
Warren:
Mr. Arnold told lies to his classmates at
school.
We couldn’t have his testimony as it
would have sent the wrong message to high
school kids.
Oswald:
Do you mean the same high school kids who
will hear that I committed a crime that I
never committed?
Warren:
Dispense with the sarcasm, Mr. Oswald.
Get on with your complaints.
Oswald:
Why did you rule out every witness who
provided exculpatory evidence as “mistaken,”
“lying” or providing hearsay?
Warren:
Who are you talking about?
Oswald:
Mr. Frazier, for example.
He told you that my bag could not
have carried the murder weapon.
You said he and his sister were
mistaken.
Warren:
There is no other way you could have gotten
the murder weapon in.
Oswald:
That is circular logic!
Warren:
You know what I mean.
Eyewitnesses make mistakes all the
time.
Oswald:
Like Mr. Brennan?
Warren:
You’ve had your say about Mr. Brennan.
What else?
Oswald:
Your Honor:
What would it take for me to prove my
innocence to you?
Warren:
Mr. Oswald, don’t you understand?
You had the word “scapegoat” written
all over you.
You were an avowed Marxist, you went
to the Soviet Union and tried to defect, you
belonged to a pro-Castro group.
When someone is killed, someone else
must be to blame for it.
Since no one appeared to like you,
anyway, we decided that you were the man for
the job.
Oswald:
Job?
I got killed trying to plead my
innocence.
Didn’t you care about the facts?
Warren:
Facts are a stubborn thing, Mr. Oswald.
We have the whole case locked up
somewhere but we can’t reveal it now.
Oswald:
Why not?
Warren:
OK.
Let me level with you.
We need to maintain a history of the
President’s death that lets the public know
that it can trust its leadership.
Letting the public believe a
conspiracy took the President’s life would
be an unmitigated disaster!
Oswald:
Worse than an innocent man being accused of
an infamous crime?
Warren:
Look, Mr. Oswald.
I am truly sorry for your plight.
Now, if you don’t mind, the
Commission must get back to its job of
maintaining law and order in the United
States.
Oswald:
What about my sentence?
Warren: The sentence is this: “The Warren Commission,
having ascertained all relevant facts and
circumstances in the murders of President
John F. Kennedy and Officer J.D. Tippit,
concludes that both murders were the act of
one man, Lee Harvey Oswald.”