Hartwell Perspective by Online Columnist Dean Hartwell

Read His Latest Book Dead Men Talking: Consequences of Government Lies!

Dead Men Talking: Consequences of Government Lies is an indictment of recent history which provides truth about the assassinations of JFK and RFK and 9/11. Read the proof of government misconduct in each of these three events!  Here are the words of Kennedy assassination expert James DiEugenio in his review of the book:


When I finished the Afterword to The Assassinations I wrote that, as in Camus' The Myth of Sisyphus, after the murder of RFK, those who believed in him and his cause felt like the stone was at the bottom of the hill. And they were alone. Today, we are not. History has caught up with some of the public. They don't like what America has become either. In that regard, we need more people like Dean Hartwell...Few who were alive in 1963 would argue the fact that the country we live in today does not resemble what we had then. Hartwell's effort is that of a true patriot offering an attempt to bridge that gap and explain how it all happened. For the benefit of us all.
 

Read the rest of the DiEugenio review here   This is DiEugenio's Update of the Review

Dead Men Talking: Consequences of Government LiesBuy Dead Men Talking It is available on Amazon for $9.99.

OpEdNews Page for Dean Hartwell -His latest columns on the news of the day

Archives Dean has written a total of over three hundred columns in the last decade!

On Conspiracy Dean's writings on conspiracy theory formed the basis of the book Dead Men Talking

Author's Account of Will and Grace Trial He and his fellow jurors rendered a verdict that found NBC guilty of fraud in a profit participation contract NBC signed with the co-founders of the TV show "Will and Grace."  But before the verdict could be read, the judge dismissed Dean, the foreperson!  This link will give you the full story on what happened.

Official web site of Judyth Vary Baker - Oswald's Lover Judyth has written a book "Me and Lee," due out in March 2010.

Other Links on This Site You can learn about Dean's first book, Truth Matters: How the Voters Can Take Back Their Nation.

Contact Dean - Email Dean with this link

 

Dead Man Talking - A Satirical Conversation between Oswald and the Warren Commission!

Chief Justice Earl Warren:  Mr. Lee Harvey Oswald, we, the Commission find you guilty of the murders of President John Kennedy and Officer J.D. Tippit.  Before I pronounce your sentence, do you have anything to say to the Commission?

 

Lee Harvey Oswald: Yes, Your Honor.  I do.  I never received a trial, let alone a fair trial.  You will violate my due process rights by punishing me.

 

Warren: We could not try you because you had an abortive transfer while in custody of the Dallas Police.

 

Oswald: You mean I was murdered!

 

Warren: Wait, Mr. Oswald.  You must not prejudice the rights of Mr. Ruby!

 

Oswald: What about my rights?  I asked for counsel several times but the Dallas police never stopped interrogating me.

 

Warren: You should have told them to stop until your lawyer arrived.

 

Oswald: The only way my lawyer could have gotten past the police is if he was Jack Ruby!

 

Warren: Watch it, Mr. Oswald!  I warned you that you must not comment on Mr. Ruby.  Your lack of counsel complaint is denied.  What else would you like to say?

 

Oswald: You took Captain Fritz’ word for it about what I said during hours and hours of interrogation.  He could have asked anyone standing outside the room for a tape recorder.

 

Warren: That is not for you to decide.  Besides, some people are gifted with great memories and we had to give Captain Fritz the benefit of the doubt.  Any other complaints?

 

Oswald: Your commission used my wife Marina’s testimony against me.  What happened to the spousal immunity?

 

Warren: It ended when you expired.  Tough break.  What else?

 

Oswald: When the police brought me in, they told me something about a policeman being killed.  Then they kept asking me questions about the President!

 

Warren: Yes.  It was a neat way of getting around the right to counsel problem.  Come on, Mr. Oswald.  The Commission’s time is precious.

 

Oswald: Those line-ups the police used caused undue prejudice against me!  They brought in people that did not look a thing like me and the witnesses had all seen my face on television!

 

Warren: Those police officers were just refreshing the memories of the witnesses, Mr. Oswald.  We are sure it was harmless error.

 

Oswald: Where was the evidence against me?  I read your Report several times and I do not believe a reasonable person could find me guilty of anything.  I do not recognize the murder weapon, so tell me how I used it.

 

Warren: The experts found your prints on it.

 

Oswald: Yes.  The FBI put my prints there – when I was in the morgue!

 

Warren: Maybe, Mr. Oswald.  But we know the public still trusts the government enough not to buy your defense.

 

Oswald: I was nowhere near the sixth floor when the President was shot.  I was downstairs on the first floor.

 

Warren: Sorry, Mr. Oswald.  You just weren’t believable.

 

Oswald: But you believed Mr. Brennan, who said that from on the ground he could describe the height of a man on the sixth floor even though you concluded that I was in a crouch.  He admitted he had lied to the authorities about whether he recognized me.

 

Warren: We believed him, but we did not base our case against you on him.

 

Oswald: And you chose not to believe Mr. Arnold, who saw a colored man on the sixth floor close to the time of the shooting.

 

Warren: Mr. Arnold told lies to his classmates at school.  We couldn’t have his testimony as it would have sent the wrong message to high school kids.

 

Oswald: Do you mean the same high school kids who will hear that I committed a crime that I never committed?

 

Warren: Dispense with the sarcasm, Mr. Oswald.  Get on with your complaints.

 

Oswald: Why did you rule out every witness who provided exculpatory evidence as “mistaken,” “lying” or providing hearsay?

 

Warren: Who are you talking about?

 

Oswald: Mr. Frazier, for example.  He told you that my bag could not have carried the murder weapon.  You said he and his sister were mistaken.

 

Warren: There is no other way you could have gotten the murder weapon in.

 

Oswald: That is circular logic!

 

Warren: You know what I mean.  Eyewitnesses make mistakes all the time.

 

Oswald: Like Mr. Brennan?

 

Warren: You’ve had your say about Mr. Brennan.  What else?

 

Oswald: Your Honor:  What would it take for me to prove my innocence to you?

 

Warren: Mr. Oswald, don’t you understand?  You had the word “scapegoat” written all over you.  You were an avowed Marxist, you went to the Soviet Union and tried to defect, you belonged to a pro-Castro group.  When someone is killed, someone else must be to blame for it.  Since no one appeared to like you, anyway, we decided that you were the man for the job.

 

Oswald: Job?  I got killed trying to plead my innocence.  Didn’t you care about the facts?

 

Warren: Facts are a stubborn thing, Mr. Oswald.  We have the whole case locked up somewhere but we can’t reveal it now.

 

Oswald: Why not?

 

Warren: OK.  Let me level with you.  We need to maintain a history of the President’s death that lets the public know that it can trust its leadership.  Letting the public believe a conspiracy took the President’s life would be an unmitigated disaster!

 

Oswald: Worse than an innocent man being accused of an infamous crime?

 

Warren: Look, Mr. Oswald.  I am truly sorry for your plight.  Now, if you don’t mind, the Commission must get back to its job of maintaining law and order in the United States.

 

Oswald: What about my sentence?


Warren
: The sentence is this: “The Warren Commission, having ascertained all relevant facts and circumstances in the murders of President John F. Kennedy and Officer J.D. Tippit, concludes that both murders were the act of one man, Lee Harvey Oswald.”

 

 

Top of Page